Search for: All records

Double cropping winter camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) with maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. (Merr.)) is a diversification strategy in northern regions. Winter camelina is reported to have low nutrient requirements, but its nitrogen (N) needs are not well understood. Studies on winter camelina without (Study 1) and with (Study 2) N fertilization were used to compare growth, seed yield and quality, and effects on soil N. Study 1 was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at one location and Study 2 was conducted from 2018 to 2020 at two locations. Grain yield was as much as six times higher in Study 2 compared with Study 1; averaged across treatments, winter camelina yielded 1157 kg ha−1 in Study 2 and 556 kg ha−1 without N. Oil and protein content ranged from 26.4 to 27.2% and 19.4 to 27.1%, respectively, in Study 1 and from 31.7 to 35.9% and 14.9 to 20.8%, respectively, in Study 2. N fertilizer increased winter camelina biomass and grain yield and soil N when double cropped with maize and soybean. Our study indicates that grain yield of winter camelina respond positively to N fertilization in a northern location. The drawback of this is the increase in residual soil N, which suggests the need for further research to balance agronomic practices with environmental outcomes. 

Abstract Various soil health indicators that measure a chemically defined fraction of nitrogen (N) or a process related to N cycling have been proposed to quantify the potential to supply N to crops, a key soil function. We evaluated five N indicators (total soil N, autoclavable citrate extractable N, water‐extractable organic N, potentially mineralizable N, andN‐acetyl‐β‐D‐glucosaminidase activity) at 124 sites with long‐term experiments across North America evaluating a variety of managements. We found that 59%–81% of the variation in N indicators was among sites, with indicator values decreasing with temperature and increasing with precipitation and clay content. The N indicators increased from 6%–39% in response to decreasing tillage, cover cropping, retaining residue, and applying organic sources of nutrients. Overall, increasing the quantity of organic inputs, whether from increased residue retention, cover cropping, or rotations with higher biomass, resulted in higher values of the N indicators. Although N indicators responded to management in similar ways, the analysis cost and availability of testing laboratories is highly variable. Further, given the strong relationships of the N indicators with carbon (C) indicators, measuring soil organic C along with 24‐h potential C mineralization could be used as a proxy for N supply instead of measuring potentially mineralizable N or any other N indicator directly.